................................................................................................
................................................................................................
MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI: A LIFE
FROM BEGINNING TO END
(BIOGRAPHIES OF PAINTERS), by
HOURLY HISTORY.
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
Well written and compiled, on the whole.
Except, perhaps only naturally, author exhibits a bias in favour of Michaelangelo, compared to his great contemporaries.
................................................................................................
Having read, several decades ago, The Agony and the Ecstasy, one expects when beginning to read this to be reminded of Irving Stone's impressive work on the subject.
Instead, one finds oneself repeatedly reminded of a work by George Eliot, and puzzled - because she'd never mentioned either Michaelangelo or any other great worl of art, except the dome, throughout her work.
One has to look up the title, and it's not Savonarola, it's Romola, but the work centre's on Savonarola and the characters that are either imaginary, created by Eliot, or referenced from history by her but so very remote and generally unknown, they are only important to her thesis, usually a moral dilemma.
Throughout her work, if one isn't well versed either dates of history, one would think Michaelangelo was yet to arrive on the scene, if one remembers that he had any connections with Florence other than present placement of his most famous work, David.
What sort of twisted mindset must one possess for this to happen, that one writes about Florence and its society and Savonarola, but ignores Michaelangelo, Botticelli and much else of the great art of the time that Florence is known for, ever since?
One can only wonder if this treatment by Eliot was merely a collossal ego - or a tremendous hatred of he Greek civilisation that preceded Roman times, and was fount of art, philosophy - and more - of Europe.
For she could easily have shifted her timeliness, but no! Instead, she chose, deliberately, to write about an era of Florence when not just one Michelangelo but his great contemporaries were creating a revolution, and not merely in art but far more.
Perhaps Leonardo da Vinci, Rafael, etc al didn't come anywhere near Florence. But Michelangelo lived there in exactly the times Eliot writes of; and she chose to write of this time and place but wipe out all memories of such great art and more.
How much hatred must one harbour at heart to do this, quite so deliberately?
For works of Eliot don't just spring and flow from her mind, or heart, or pen. They are painstakingly crafted with deliberately designed characters, events, and more. They aren't unavoidable, as inspired creations are, but carefully considered writings.
................................................................................................
"In all, Michelangelo would spend two years at the Medici Palace, but within those finite years ... "
Since when isn't human life finite?
It's obvious that the author is illiterate enough to confuse "finite" with short duration.
................................................................................................
"Nevertheless, there was a small remnant of the Medici family that had managed to hang on to some semblance of power. One of these familial survivors, a man named Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco de’ Medici, began to partner with Michelangelo for the furtherance of new art projects. Lorenzo hired Michelangelo to create two specific works of art. Drawing once again on the contradictory tastes of the Medicis, Lorenzo commissioned Michelangelo to sculpt a statue of John the Baptist, as well as a sleeping Cupid. Although often confused in modern times for a type of angel, the Cupid was a strictly pagan entity, sometimes referred to as Eros or the god of love.
"After Michelangelo finished his work on the latter, he entered into further controversy—this time not so much for the pagan origins of his piece but for the fact that he and Lorenzo attempted to engage in a kind of fraud with the finished product. Lorenzo allegedly wanted to sell the piece at a higher price by dressing up Michelangelo’s newly christened Cupid as an ancient artifact. Lorenzo is said to have advised Michelangelo, “If you can manage to make it look as if it had been buried under the Earth I will forward it to Rome.” In Rome the Cupid would be sold as a priceless antique, rather than a newly minted sculpture. The fake antique managed to bring in the hefty sum of 200 ducats for its deception, being purchased by a certain Cardinal Raffaele Riario."
One think this might have taught them that hype about antique is stupid, but no!
................................................................................................
"The opportunity would finally come to him in November of 1497 when the French ambassador to the Vatican, Cardinal Jean Bilhères de Lagraulas, hired Michelangelo to work on what would be called Michelangelo’s Pietà, a touching scene illustrating Mary mourning her son Jesus Christ. For this art project, Michelangelo would be paid the large sum of 450 ducats, more than enough to keep him—as well as the family he was supporting back in Florence—afloat for quite some time.
"The situation back in Florence meanwhile, had become turbulent once again with the arrest of Girolamo Savonarola, the charismatic preacher who had been the acting head of the city-state since the Medicis had been deposed. Savonarola had been taken into custody on April 8, 1498, and after being subjected to weeks of severe torture, he was coerced into confessing that he was a false prophet merely seeking “worldly ambition.” After giving his confession, Savonarola was promptly executed by hanging and then burned in the public square, so that all would see that the end of the preacher’s stewardship had arrived."
Not burnt at stake, then?
When did church begin that?
................................................................................................
"In the aftermath of Savonarola’s demise, the affluent class of Florentine nobility attempted to fill the ensuing vacuum, but it was of no use, and Florence began to be seen as a ship without a captain at its helm. It was in this moment of vulnerability that ongoing skirmishes with the neighboring city-state of Pisa began to heat up into an all-out war. In the midst of these dire straits, the city leadership sought a morale booster for the populace of Florence. A new art project was proposed depicting the famous slayer of giants, the biblical King David. The narrative of the poor shepherd boy—future king—defeating the giant Goliath seemed to be the perfect symbol for the uneasy citizenry of Florence to rally behind.
"According to Michelangelo’s friend and original biographer Giorgio Vasari, Michelangelo had first heard about the project by word of mouth, stating that, “From Florence, some of his friends urged him to return so that he might be awarded the carving of the marble that had lain ruined in the yard of the Opera del Duomo, which Gonfaloniere Piero Soderini then had in mind to give to the other famed Renaissance artist, Leonardo da Vinci.”"
Electrifying thought - how would David have looked if it were carved by Leonardo da Vinci, the superior artist and philosopher, and more?
................................................................................................
"Michelangelo made his return back to Rome in 1505 at the express invitation of the then reigning pontiff, Pope Julius II, who hired him to work on a project for his own tomb. Pope Julius was a very ambitious man, and it is said that no sooner than the papal miter was placed on his head, he began to think of his legacy. And in terms of popes, a lasting legacy usually meant having an impressive tomb. Initially the project entailed the construction of 40 statues and was slated to be completed in five years’ time. In reality, Michelangelo would work on the Pope’s tomb for nearly 40 years.
"He would temporarily deviate from this project for other various side projects, one of which would be arguably his most famous masterpiece of all, the extravagant mural painting on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. Michelangelo completed this epic piece of illustrated biblical history in about four years’ time, from 1508 to 1512.
"According to one of Michelangelo’s early biographers, Ascanio Condivi, it was initially at the conniving of an architect and alleged foe by the name of Bramante that Michelangelo was awarded this monumental task. According to this theory, Bramante who knew Michelangelo primarily for his work as a sculptor believed that such a feat as painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel would be too overwhelming and Michelangelo would be doomed to failure in the task. It is said that it was out of his capricious wish for Michelangelo to fail that he persuaded the Pope to hand the job over to Michelangelo.
"At the time Michelangelo was initially hired on to paint the Twelve Apostles on the triangular vaultings of the ceiling, as well as the creation of a simple decoration on the center of the ceiling. Michelangelo of course would eventually convince the Pope to allow him to greatly expand upon these initial designs, proposing an entire illustrative representation of the Bible from creation, the fall, to salvation through Christ, a work that would ultimately span over 500 square feet with over 300 characters painted.
................................................................................................
"Michelangelo then immediately began work on what would become The Crucifixion of St. Peter. The subject matter of this painting involves the extra-biblical account of how Peter met his end—being crucified upside down by the Romans. In this painting, Michelangelo brilliantly takes care of the harsh reality Peter had been dealt, rendering an image that many others had found quite difficult to fathom—that of a man hanging from a crucifix upside down. It seems that Michelangelo’s studies of corpses and their anatomy gave him a much-needed edge in understanding exactly how the human body might present itself when subjected to such a condition. The Crucifixion of St. Peter was completed in 1550 and would be the last major painting the artist would render."
Funny, why isn't this crucifixion talked of more?
Because it may affect people diluting the virulent antisemitic diatribe they've absorbed from church preaching it gor seventeen centuries, based in false propaganda?
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
"The ingenious artist we know as Michelangelo lived during the Renaissance in Northern Italy, and you could say that he was indeed a renaissance man—he was a painter, sculptor, poet, and an engineer all rolled up into one. Even though it has been some 450 years since his passing, his legacy remains one of the strongest on record. If the burgeoning art student of today wishes to learn from the best, he takes his notes directly from Michelangelo.
"He lived for his art, and despite the chaos of kings, popes, and the civil government around him, Michelangelo Buonarroti made sure that his works of artistic expression would withstand the scrutiny of time.
... "
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
"“It is necessary to keep one’s compass in one’s eyes and not in the hand, for the hands execute, but the eye judges.”
"—Michelangelo"
................................................................................................
"His full name was Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni. Like all Italians of that era, his long name was meant to signify his long lineage in the particular region from which he had sprung.
"Michelangelo arrived into this world in the early morning hours of March 6, 1475 in the small Italian village of Caprese. He came from a family of bankers, but in all irony, by the time of his birth his own family was nearly bankrupt. The bank had collapsed, and in order to keep the family afloat Michelangelo’s father, Ludovico di Leonardo Buonarroti Simoni, took a government posting as a local podestà, which is an Italian term for a kind of chief administrator. Interestingly enough, Lodovico received this posting completely by chance; in fact, he had been awarded the position after his name had been pulled out of a bag. This random lottery was apparently how local authorities filled the position with eligible citizens. Michelangelo’s mom was a woman named Francesca di Neri del Miniato di Siena who claimed descent from a countess, Mathilde of Canossa. Before Michelangelo broke out into the art world later in life, this supposed link to the countess was the family’s one and only claim to fame.