................................................................................................
................................................................................................
THE ODYSSEY OF KASHMIRI PANDITS :
DESTINATION-HOMELAND-PANUN KASHMIR
by
Dr. M.L.BHAT.
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
As one begins to read expecting a coherent account of the history and travails of the community, the very first puzzle of course is the cover- surely it doesn't portray a Kashmiri Pandit? - but then, as one reads, puzzle grows. The author isn't giving an academic compiled account of the history, but neither is it entirely a coherent storytelling of a personal nature.
What's more, author - very well read - diverts so often into philosophical ruminations, quoting from so very many illustrious poets, philosophers and more of yore, that one has to simply relax and proceed to hear out the recounting that's by now developed into a fireside story told by someone who personally suffered the horrors, and saw sufferings of others.
It suddenly gets through that it's a very quiet lament of grief, sung in sorrow, but as silent as wind flowing.
................................................................................................
One recalls a quiet conversation with a colleague, reinforcing the awareness of the events that were barely acknowledged officially or in media, but in an instant very real just looking at the colleague who wasn't one to indulge in pathos.
Was it before that or after, that another couple of colleagues had a hot and bitter debate about the then infamous report being circulated, regarding Indian military having raped a village? The staunch simple Eastern one was adamant that the report couldn't be true, it just couldn't. The modern Tamilian with avant-garde attire and lifestyle, argued that such faith stains reports to the contrary was simplistic.
He, descendent of Western migrants to Northeast, was right. In fact the said village didn't exist, no such horror had ever taken place, as eventually established some years later, by painstakingly conducted Western NGO investigations, and the lie had been as deliberately spread as the one about a ten year old Palestinian boy shot dead. That lie had been exposed by a Columbia University class, slightly earlier than that about Kashmir village. The bullet that killed the boy could only have come ftom the one direction the father wasn't protecting the boy, it became obvious on site inspection. He'd been shot by Palestinian terrorists.
And somewhere over halfway through this book, it suddenly becomes clear that the debate between my colleagues was just as misdirected. The horrors perpetrated had been by the others, not Indian military, but paki exfiltrated terrorists.
And that tallies either not only the details from autobiography of Malala, or reports about conduct by ISIS, but even the most recent conduct of taliban in Afghanistan issuing edicts about females.
But the lie was typical of a pattern that matched the one about the Palestinian boy - and the refugee camp massacre in Lebanon, early to mid eighties. That was blamed on Israel, falsely, but responsibility lay elsewhere, as Thomas Friedman exposed in his work on Beirut.
................................................................................................